Compare

Kartpunkt or Belägenhetsadress Direkt

Belägenhetsadress Direkt is Lantmäteriet's own API for the same register Kartpunkt serves. It costs 0 kr for those whose use Lantmäteriet approves. Kartpunkt reads the same register from Lantmäteriet's deliveries and charges for what it adds on top.

Side by side

Belägenhetsadress DirektKartpunkt
DataLantmäteriet's address register, from the sourceLantmäteriet's address register, from Lantmäteriet's deliveries
FreshnessThe register as Lantmäteriet holds itLantmäteriet's weekly deliveries, checked for daily; every answer states the date of its data
Price0 krUtvecklare free with test keys; live data from SEK 490 a month, excl. VAT
AccessYour own application to Lantmäteriet; use bound by the purpose it approvesTest keys at sign-in; live data under an agreement with Kartpunkt, whose access Lantmäteriet granted on 2026-09-23
SearchStep-wise autocomplete and free-text searchSearch that tolerates typos, with match_type on each hit
Reverse geocodingThe nearest address to a pointThe nearest addresses, one per street on request, with the road
ValidationLookup by idissues for what is wrong, never silently corrected
Property linkYesNo
Roads, road distances, routesNot in its technical descriptionFrom Trafikverket's NVDB
DocumentationLantmäteriet's technical descriptionllms.txt and an OpenAPI 3.1 document for coding agents

When Direkt fits better

  • You want the register at no cost and can go through Lantmäteriet's review of your purpose yourself.
  • You need the link from an address to its property, which Kartpunkt does not serve.
  • You want no service between you and the source.

When Kartpunkt fits

  • You want to build today on test keys, without an application of your own.
  • You need search that tolerates typos, validation that names what is wrong, or change checks for addresses you stored.
  • You need roads, road distances or routes from NVDB in the same API.
  • You want documentation a coding agent can follow.

Sources

Unverified: we have not called Direkt, so we make no claim about how its search handles misspellings, and we read its validation and the absence of roads from the technical description only.